Screening for Quality of Life in a Neurology Tic Clinic Using Quality Improvement Methodology.

BACKGROUND: Tic disorders in children often co-occur with other disorders that can significantly impact functioning. Screening for quality of life (QoL) can help identify optimal treatment paths. This quality improvement (QI) study describes implementation of a QoL measure in a busy neurology clinic to help guide psychological intervention for patients with tics. METHODS: Using QI methodology outlined by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, this study implemented the PedsQL Generic Core (4.0) in an outpatient medical clinic specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of tic disorders. Assembling a research team to design process maps and key driver diagrams helped identify gaps in the screening process. Conducting several plan-do-study-act cycles refined identification of patients appropriate to receive the measure. Over the three-year study, electronic health record notification tools and data collection were increasingly utilized to capture patients' information during their visit. RESULTS: Over 350 unique patients were screened during the assessment period. Electronic means replaced paper measures as time progressed. The percentage of patients completing the measure increased from 0% to 51.9% after the initial implementation of process improvement, advancing to 91.6% after the introduction of electronic measures. This average completion rate was sustained for 15 months. CONCLUSIONS: Using QI methodology helped identify the pragmatics of implementing a QoL assessment to enhance screening practices in a busy medical clinic. Assessment review at the time of appointment helped inform treatment and referral decisions.

Severe communication delays are independent of seizure burden and persist despite contemporary treatments in SCN1A+ Dravet syndrome: Insights from the ENVISION natural history study.

OBJECTIVE: Dravet syndrome (DS) is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by high seizure burden, treatment-resistant epilepsy, and developmental stagnation. Family members rate communication deficits among the most impactful disease manifestations. We evaluated seizure burden and language/communication development in children with DS. METHODS: ENVISION was a prospective, observational study evaluating children with DS associated with SCN1A pathogenic variants (SCN1A+ DS) enrolled at age ≤5 years. Seizure burden and antiseizure medications were assessed every 3 months and communication and language every 6 months with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd edition and the parent-reported Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales 3rd edition. We report data from the first year of observation, including analyses stratified by age at Baseline: 0:6-2:0 years:months (Y:M; youngest), 2:1-3:6 Y:M (middle), and 3:7-5:0 Y:M (oldest). RESULTS: Between December 2020 and March 2023, 58 children with DS enrolled at 16 sites internationally. Median follow-up was 17.5 months (range = .0-24.0), with 54 of 58 (93.1%) followed for at least 6 months and 51 of 58 (87.9%) for 12 months. Monthly countable seizure frequency (MCSF) increased with age (median [minimum-maximum] = 1.0 in the youngest [1.0-70.0] and middle [1.0-242.0] age groups and 4.5 [.0-2647.0] in the oldest age group), and remained high, despite use of currently approved antiseizure medications. Language/communication delays were observed early, and developmental stagnation occurred after age 2 years with both instruments. In predictive modeling, chronologic age was the only significant covariate of seizure frequency (effect size = .52, p = .024). MCSF, number of antiseizure medications, age at first seizure, and convulsive status epilepticus were not predictors of language/communication raw scores. SIGNIFICANCE: In infants and young children with SCN1A+ DS, language/communication delay and stagnation were independent of seizure burden. Our findings emphasize that the optimal therapeutic window to prevent language/communication delay is before 3 years of age.

Implementing American Academy of Neurology Quality Measures in Antigua Using Quality Improvement Methodology.

Background and Objectives: The American Academy of Neurology has developed quality measures related to various neurologic disorders. A gap exists in the implementation of these measures in the different health care systems. To date, there has been no electronic health care record nor implementation of quality measures in Antigua. Therefore, we aimed to increase the percent of patients who have epilepsy quality measures documented using standardized common data elements in the outpatient neurology clinic at Sir Lester Bird Medical Center from 0% to 80% per week by June 1, 2022 and sustain for 6 months. Methods: We used the Institute for Health care Improvement Model for Improvement methodology. A data use agreement was implemented. Data were displayed using statistical process control charts and the American Society for Quality criteria to determine statistical significance and centerline shifts. Results: Current and future state process maps were developed to determine areas of opportunity for interventions. Interventions were developed following a "Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle." One intervention was the creation of a RedCap survey and database to be used by health care providers during clinical patient encounters. Because of multiple interventions, we achieved a 100% utilization of the survey for clinical care. Discussion: Quality improvement (QI) methodology can be used for implementation of quality measures in various settings to improve patient care outcomes without use of significant resources. Implementation of quality measures can increase efficiency in clinical delivery. Similar QI methodology could be implemented in other resource-limited countries of the Caribbean and globally.

Patient family engagement and partnership: Pilot survey results in assessing behavior, communication, and quality of life in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and other drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) and other drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) can impact behavior, communication, and quality of life (QoL). In collaboration with community engagement efforts with the Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome Foundation (LGSF), we aimed to gain an initial snapshot of patient and family perspectives and experiences with evaluation of behavior, communication, and QoL. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to collect self-reported information from caregivers of children with LGS and other DRE regarding their perspectives and experiences with healthcare providers' evaluation of behavior, communication, and QoL. The survey tool was developed by the study investigators in partnership with the LGS Foundation and had diffused to caregivers online by epilepsy advocacy groups including the Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Alliance (PESA). Responses were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The survey asked for caregiver perspectives and assessed which instruments the caregivers had previously been given for measuring these domains. RESULTS: Responses from 245 caregivers were included, with 132 (54%) caregivers of an individual with LGS and 113 (46%) caregivers of an individual with non-LGS related DRE. Respondents reported that 66% of their loved ones had undergone epilepsy-related surgery. Over 90% agreed that measuring behavior, communication, and QoL was important, but fewer than half felt that their healthcare providers evaluated these domains well. LGS caregivers largely shared non-LGS caregivers' perspectives; however, they reported more frequently that communication was not evaluated enough. Barriers to measuring these domains included a lack of good surveys (developmentally appropriate and specific to the type of epilepsy) or not receiving any survey instruments for these domains during clinic appointments. Caregivers play a crucial role for individuals with DRE, and their input is essential in identifying challenges and needs. Caregivers believe that measuring behavior, communication, and quality of life is important, and most of them feel that their loved ones are not adequately evaluated during their healthcare encounters. There is a need for appropriately scaled survey instruments to measure areas of importance for patients and caregivers, as well as incorporation of these outcomes in the healthcare discussion.

Multidisciplinary Care for Pediatric Patients With Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures May Be Associated With Decreased Health Care Utilization.

Background and Objectives: Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are paroxysmal events that resemble epileptic seizures but have psychological underpinnings. Patients with PNES have high health care utilization. We hypothesize that appropriate care would lead to decreases in utilization. The aim of this study was to measure the impact of a multidisciplinary PNES clinic in reducing health care utilization (HCU) in youth with PNES referred to the clinic. Methods: We reviewed the frequency of visits to the emergency department (ED), urgent care (UC), planned and unplanned hospitalizations, neurodiagnostic studies, and total charges associated with these encounters 12 months before and 12 months after initial referral to the clinic. Manual chart review of all patients referred from November 2017 to March 2020 was performed. Results: Two hundred and twelve unique patients were included in this retrospective study. Patient sex was identified as 71% female, 28% male, and 1% other, with an average age of 14 years at diagnosis. These patients visited the ED a total of 410 times before being seen in the PNES clinic, which decreased to 187 visits after (75% reduction). All measures of HCU decreased in the 12 months after the visit, and statistically significant differences were observed in all measures of HCU except for head MRIs, leading to an estimated potential cost savings of $7,978,447. Discussion: Patients with PNES were found to have decreased health care utilization in the 12 months after referral to the Nationwide Children's Hospital multidisciplinary clinic, including significant decreases in emergency services and unnecessary diagnostic testing, in the 12 months after the referral.

Counseling on the Need for Folic Acid in Adolescents With Epilepsy.

Background and Objectives: Folic acid is an important supplement to take for women with epilepsy on antiseizure medications (ASMs). Determination of baseline counseling given to women with epilepsy and the association with folic acid being recommended were evaluated. Factors surrounding the association were reviewed. Methods: An exploratory retrospective review of women with epilepsy seen at a large Midwestern pediatric institution was performed between January 2018 and January 2020. Results: Patients who received preconception counseling were more likely to be given a recommendation to take folic acid. Patients on more than 1 ASM were likely to receive counseling. Patient age and race were associated with having folic acid recommended. Discussion: Providing preconception counseling for women with epilepsy is associated with an increased recommendation and prescription of folic acid. Further evaluation into possible disparities to receiving a folic acid recommendation is needed.

Self-management education for children with epilepsy and their caregivers. A scoping review.

Self-management education programs have been highly successful in preparing people to manage medical conditions with recurring events. A detailed curriculum for epilepsy patients, and their caretakers, is lacking. Here we assess what is available for patients who have disorders with recurring events and offer an approach to developing a potential self-care curriculum for patients with seizures and their caregivers. Among the anticipated components are a baseline efficacy assessment and training tailored to increasing self-efficacy, medication compliance, and stress management. Those at risk of status epilepticus will also need guidance in preparing a personalized seizure action plan and training in how to decide when rescue medication is appropriate and how to administer the therapy. Peers, as well as professionals, could teach and provide support. To our knowledge, no such programs are currently available in English. We encourage their creation, dissemination, and widespread use.

Efficacy of cannabidiol in convulsive and nonconvulsive seizure types associated with treatment-resistant epilepsies in the Expanded Access Program.

The cannabidiol (CBD) Expanded Access Program (EAP), initiated in 2014, provided CBD (Epidiolex) to patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE). In the final pooled analysis of 892 patients treated through January 2019 (median exposure = 694 days), CBD treatment was associated with a 46%-66% reduction in median monthly total (convulsive plus nonconvulsive) seizure frequency. CBD was well tolerated, and adverse events were consistent with previous findings. We used pooled EAP data to investigate the effectiveness of add-on CBD therapy for individual convulsive seizure types (clonic, tonic, tonic-clonic, atonic, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic), nonconvulsive seizure types (focal with and without impaired consciousness, absence [typical and atypical], myoclonic, myoclonic absence), and epileptic spasms. CBD treatment was associated with a reduction in the frequency of convulsive seizure types (median percentage reduction = 47%-100%), and nonconvulsive seizure types and epileptic spasms (median percentage reduction = 50%-100%) across visit intervals through 144 weeks of treatment. Approximately 50% of patients had ≥50% reduction in convulsive and nonconvulsive seizure types and epileptic spasms at nearly all intervals. These results show a favorable effect of long-term CBD use in patients with TRE, who may experience various convulsive and nonconvulsive seizure types. Future controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Implementing Evidence-Based, Electronic, Substance-Use Screening in a Primary Care Clinic.

PURPOSE: Substance use is common among adolescents, and among those with substance use disorders; use often persists into middle age, underlying the importance of early detection and treatment. The goal of this quality improvement project was to increase the electronic substance use screening rate of adolescents presenting for preventative health visits from 0% to 50% between March 2021 and September 2021. METHODS: This is an ongoing quality improvement project. Participants included patients ≥12 who presented to the Adolescent Medicine Clinic for preventative health visits. We incorporated the Screening to Brief Intervention into the existing Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble tool within the electronic health record. We completed a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle by reviewing every patient's chart who did not receive screening and identified that a common reason for missed screening was designating the visit as "establishing care" rather than preventative health visit. We modified our eligible patient criteria to include all adolescents presenting to establish primary care. RESULTS: We achieved a statistically significant center-line shift with a p value (<.001) from approximately 0% at baseline to a new baseline of 85% from June 2021 to June 2022. After broadening our eligibility criteria, our electronic screening rate improved from 78% in November 2021, to 83% in December 2021. DISCUSSION: Electronic health record integration of the Screening to Brief Intervention/Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble is an effective method to systematically and electronically screen adolescents for SUD at preventative health visits. Integration using similar approaches may benefit other institutions interested in providing standardized SUD screening.

Predictors of objective treatment adherence in adolescents with epilepsy: The important role of motivation.

OBJECTIVE: Adolescents with epilepsy are at heightened risk for suboptimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) adherence; however, there is a paucity of adherence interventions for this age group. The current study aimed to identify a comprehensive and novel set of predictors of objective, electronically-monitored ASM adherence in adolescents with epilepsy. METHODS: Participants included 104 adolescents (13-17 years old; M = 15.36 ± 1.40), diagnosed with epilepsy and their caregivers. Cross-sectional data were collected from adolescents, caregivers, healthcare providers, and medical chart reviews, including demographics (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, sex, insurance status), the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., participation before versus during), seizure characteristics (i.e., presence and severity), ASM side effects (Pediatric Epilepsy Side Effects Questionnaire), adherence motivation (1-item 6-point Likert scale item), and adherence barriers (Pediatric Epilepsy Medication Self-Management Questionnaire). Electronically-monitored adherence data was collected via the AdhereTechTM pill bottle or the Vaica SimpleMedTM pillbox over 30 days. RESULTS: Adolescents demonstrated suboptimal adherence at 78 ± 31.6%, despite high ASM adherence motivation (M = 4.43 ± .94) and minimal adherence barriers (M = 35.64 ± 3.78). Hierarchical multiple regression, which included non-modifiable sociodemographic and medical variables (Block 1) and behaviorally modifiable psychosocial variables (Block 2) was significant, F(12,87) = 3.69, p < .001. Specifically, having private insurance (versus Medicaid or public insurance; t = -2.11, p = .038) and higher adherence motivation (t = 2.91, p = .005) predicted higher objective ASM adherence. CONCLUSION: Routine assessment of adherence predictors is vital for the promotion of adherence among adolescents with epilepsy. Adolescent adherence motivation may be an important element of multi-component interventions focused on improving ASM adherence in adolescents with epilepsy.

Pilot randomized controlled clinical trial of an adherence social norms intervention for adolescents with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Non-adherence to anti-seizure medications (ASMs) is common for adolescents with epilepsy, with potentially devastating consequences. Existing adherence interventions in epilepsy do not meet the unique challenges faced by adolescents. Leveraging social norms capitalizes on the increased importance of peer influence while simultaneously targeting the low motivation levels of many adolescents. The current study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction of a social norms adherence intervention in adolescents with epilepsy. METHODS: A pilot RCT of a mHealth social norms intervention was conducted with adolescents with epilepsy who demonstrated non-adherence (≤95% adherence) during baseline. Adolescents were randomized to either (1) mHealth social norms (reminders, individualized and social norms adherence feedback) or (2) control (reminders and individualized adherence feedback). Primary outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. Exploratory outcomes included electronically monitored adherence, seizure severity, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). RESULTS: One hundred four adolescents were recruited (53% female; Mage = 15.4 ± 1.4 years; 81% White: Non-Hispanic; 5% Black, 10% Bi/Multiracial; 2% White: Hispanic; 1% Other: Hispanic; 1% Bi/Multiracial-Hispanic). Forty-five percent screen-failed due to high adherence, 16% withdrew, and 38% were randomized to treatment (n = 19) or control (n = 21). Recruitment (75%), retention (78%), and treatment satisfaction were moderately high. Engagement with the intervention was moderate, with 64% of participants engaging with intervention notifications. Exploratory analyses revealed that after controlling for COVID-19 impact, the social norms intervention group maintained higher adherence over time compared to the control group. Small to moderate effect sizes were noted for seizure severity and HRQOL between groups. CONCLUSION: This pilot intervention appeared feasible and acceptable. Increases in adherence in the treatment versus control group were modest, but a future larger more adequately powered study is needed to detect effects. Notably, it appeared the COVID pandemic influenced adherence behaviors during our trial.

Long-term efficacy and safety of cannabidiol in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsies: Four-year results from the expanded access program.

OBJECTIVE: Cannabidiol (CBD) expanded access program, initiated in 2014, provided add-on CBD to patients with treatment-resistant epilepsies (TREs) at 35 US epilepsy centers. Prior publications reported results through December 2016; herein, we present efficacy and safety results through January 2019. METHODS: Patients received plant-derived highly purified CBD (Epidiolex®; 100 mg/ml oral solution), increasing from 2 to 10 mg/kg/day to tolerance or maximum 25-50 mg/kg/day dose, depending on the study site. Efficacy endpoints included percentage change from baseline in median monthly convulsive and total seizure frequency and ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% responder rates across 12-week visit windows for up to 192 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were documented at each visit. RESULTS: Of 892 patients in the safety analysis set, 322 (36%) withdrew; lack of efficacy (19%) and AEs (7%) were the most commonly reported primary reasons for withdrawal. Median (range) age was 11.8 years (range = 0-74.5), and patients were taking a median of three (range = 0-10) antiseizure medications (ASMs) at baseline; the most common ASMs were clobazam (47%), levetiracetam (34%), and valproate (28%). Median top CBD dose was 25 mg/kg/day; median exposure duration was 694 days. Median percentage reduction from baseline ranged 50%-67% for convulsive seizures and 46%-66% for total seizures. Convulsive seizure responder rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction) ranged 51%-59%, 33%-42%, and 11%-17% of patients across visit windows, respectively. AEs were reported in 88% of patients and serious AEs in 41%; 8% withdrew because of an AE. There were 20 deaths during the study deemed unrelated to treatment by the investigator. The most common AEs (≥20% of patients) were diarrhea (33%), seizure (24%), and somnolence (23%). SIGNIFICANCE: Add-on CBD was associated with sustained seizure reduction up to 192 weeks with an acceptable safety profile and can be used for long-term treatment of TREs.

Development of a core outcome set for quality of life for adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: A multistakeholder Delphi consensus study.

OBJECTIVE: In 2017, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) convened the AAN Quality Measurement Set working group to define the improvement and maintenance of quality of life (QOL) as a key outcome measure in epilepsy clinical practice. A core outcome set (COS), defined as an accepted, standardized set of outcomes that should be minimally measured and reported in an area of health care research and practice, has not previously been defined for QOL in adult epilepsy. METHODS: A cross-sectional Delphi consensus study was employed to attain consensus from patients and caregivers on the QOL outcomes that should be minimally measured and reported in epilepsy clinical practice. Candidate items were compiled from QOL scales recommended by the AAN 2017 Quality Measurement Set. Inclusion criteria to participate in the Delphi study were adults with drug-resistant epilepsy diagnosed by a physician, no prior diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures or a cognitive and/or developmental disability, or caregivers of patients meeting these criteria. RESULTS: A total of 109 people satisfied inclusion/exclusion criteria and took part in Delphi Round 1 (patients, n = 95, 87.2%; caregivers, n = 14, 12.8%), and 55 people from Round 1 completed Round 2 (patients, n = 43, 78.2%; caregivers, n = 12, 21.8%). One hundred three people took part in the final consensus round. Consensus was attained by patients/caregivers on a set of 36 outcomes that should minimally be included in the QOL COS. Of these, 32 of the 36 outcomes (88.8%) pertained to areas outside of seizure frequency and severity. SIGNIFICANCE: Using patient-centered Delphi methodology, this study defines the first COS for QOL measurement in clinical practice for adults with drug-resistant epilepsy. This set highlights the diversity of factors beyond seizure frequency and severity that impact QOL in epilepsy.

Introduction to use of an acute seizure action plan for seizure clusters and guidance for implementation.

It is important for patients with epilepsy and their caregivers, including care partners, to understand the patient's seizure clusters and what to do when they occur. In many instances, seizure clusters are unique to each patient. The knowledge gained from understanding a patient's seizure cluster or seizure pattern provides a foundation for taking prompt action to prevent worsening to prolonged seizures, status epilepticus, and potentially death. Seizure action plans (SAPs), which are similar to the disease-related treatment action plans for other conditions, can be developed by a health care provider (HCP) in conjunction with the patient with epilepsy and/or caregivers, and SAPs are specifically customized for the individual patient and his or her seizure management. However, the current literature lacks unified guidance on how to design SAPs that will help prepare patients and caregivers for rapidly determining and initiating appropriate treatment of acute seizure emergencies in the community and at home. Here, we examine the current usage and value of SAPs for pediatric and adult patients with epilepsy, and we introduce the concept of the acute SAP (ASAP) for use specifically during seizure emergencies, such as seizure clusters. This type of standardized, simplified, and customized plan can rapidly and concisely provide patients and caregivers with a practical protocol to treat a seizure cluster consistently, appropriately, and in a timely manner. Details on potential content and formats of ASAPs are provided. Following this is a discussion of barriers to ASAP use that may affect HCPs or patients and caregivers, including lack of standardization, relevance, and personalization and pitfalls associated with technology. This leads into a discussion of guidance for developing, implementing, and updating ASAPs that suggests ways to address the barriers and ensure that the ASAP is best suited to the patient's needs.

Prioritizing Hormone Therapy Over Vigabatrin as the First Treatment for Infantile Spasms: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Infantile spasms (IS) are early childhood seizures with potentially devastating consequences. Standard therapies (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH], high-dose prednisolone, and vigabatrin) are strongly recommended as the first treatment for IS. Although this recommendation comes without preference for one standard therapy over another, early remission rates are higher with hormone therapy (ACTH and high-dose prednisolone) when compared with vigabatrin. Using quality improvement (QI) methodology that included hormone therapy as the first treatment, we sought to increase the percentage of children with new-onset nontuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated IS achieving 3-month electroclinical remission from a mean of 53.8% to ≥70%. METHODS: This was an observational consecutive sample cohort study at a single academic tertiary care hospital that compared a prospective intervention cohort (May 2019-January 2022, N = 57) with a retrospective baseline cohort (November 2015-April 2019, N = 67). Our initiative addressed key drivers such as the routine use of vigabatrin over hormone therapy as first treatment and the common initiation of a second treatment after 14 days for initial nonresponders. We included consecutive children without TSC presenting with new-onset IS diagnosed and treated between ages 2 and 24 months. We displayed our primary outcome and process measures as control charts in which the centerline is the quarterly (previous 3 months) mean based on statistical process control methodology. RESULTS: QI interventions that included the standardization of hormone therapy as the first treatment resulted in higher rates of 3-month remission, rising from 53.8% (baseline cohort) to 75.9% (intervention cohort). Process measure results included an increased rate of children receiving hormone therapy as first treatment (mean, 44.6%-100%) and a decreased number of days to both clinical follow-up after first treatment (mean, of 16.3-12.6 days) and starting a second treatment within 14 days for initial nonresponders (mean, 36.3-17.2 days). DISCUSSION: For children with IS, improved rates of 3-month electroclinical remission can be achieved with QI methodology. Implementation of similar QI initiatives at other centers may likewise improve local remission rates.

A Multicenter Study of Adherence to Best Practices and Application of Epilepsy Quality Metrics in a Pediatric Telemedicine Encounter.

Objective: To assess Epilepsy Quality Metrics (EQM) and guideline implementation in new pediatric patients seen in telemedicine. Methods: Multicenter, cross sectional, retrospective analysis. Results: Patients were similar across 3 centers for age, gender, and insurance type. Eighty-one percent presented for spells. One hundred sixty patients with epilepsy formed the EQM cohort. Results: Seizures described: 95%; frequency: 67%, last seizure documented: 81%, epilepsy syndrome documented: 67%; epilepsy diagnosis: 77%, medications reviewed: 56%, adverse events discussed: 73%. Quality of life discussed: 3%. Anticipatory guidance was described as follows: seizure safety, 57%; driving, 47%; SUDEP, 11%; vitamin D discussion, 19%; pregnancy and folic acid counseling, 4% and 10%. Epileptologists were 4 times as likely as generalists in discussing driving safety (odds ratio 3.93, 95% confidence interval 1.7-8.9; P = .001) for all ages. Significance: Performance on EQM and guideline implementation in pediatric epilepsy telemedicine encounters can be improved.

Predicting Patient No-Shows in an Academic Pediatric Neurology Clinic.

Background: No-shows can negatively affect patient care. Efforts to predict high-risk patients are needed. Previously, our epilepsy clinic identified patients with 2 or more no-shows or late cancelations in the past 18 months as being at high risk for no-shows. Our objective was to develop a model to accurately predict the risk of no-shows among patients with epilepsy seen at our neurology clinic. Methods: Using electronic health record data, we developed a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-regularized logistic regression model to predict no-shows and compared its performance with our neurology clinic's above-mentioned ad hoc rule. Results: The ad hoc rule identified 13% of patients seen at our neurology clinic as high-risk patients for no-shows and resulted in a positive predictive value of 38%. In comparison, our LASSO model resulted in a positive predictive value of 48%. Our LASSO model identified that lack of private insurance, inactive Epic MyChart, greater past no-show rates, fewer appointment changes before the appointment date, and follow-up appointments were more likely to result in no-shows. Conclusions: Our LASSO model outperformed the ad hoc rule used by our neurology clinic in predicting patients at high risk for no-shows. Social workers can use the no-show risk scores generated by our LASSO model to prioritize high-risk patients for targeted intervention to reduce no-shows at our neurology clinic.

Leveraging electronic patient diaries in SUDEP risk evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the risk factors known to be related to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) that can be extracted from patients that utilizes an online seizure diary tool (SeizureTracker™). METHOD: We conducted a descriptive analysis of SeizureTracker™ users across factors relevant to SUDEP risk. We also compared our app-using cohort to published SUDEP case-control studies. RESULTS: We report across seven risk factors from 30,813 users of SeizureTracker™ who had a median length of time using the app of 5.69 years (range from 1 month to 15 years). We found that they are at greater risk for SUDEP than groups from published studies (p < .00001) based on the risk factor of generalized tonic-clonic seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrated that the population using the SeizureTracker™ tool can be a valuable population for expanding investigation of SUDEP risk factors and is a first step towards establishing a large sample with a method to ascertain data prospectively that might be critical to developing a SUDEP risk algorithm.

Biallelic SEPSECS variants in two siblings with pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 2D underscore the relevance of splice-disrupting synonymous variants in disease.

Noncoding and synonymous coding variants that exert their effects via alternative splicing are increasingly recognized as an important category of disease-causing variants. In this report, we describe two siblings who presented with hypotonia, profound developmental delays, and seizures. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the proband at 5 yr showed diffuse cerebral and cerebellar white matter volume loss. Both siblings later developed ventilator-dependent respiratory insufficiency and scoliosis and are currently nonverbal and nonambulatory. Extensive molecular testing including oligo array and clinical exome sequencing was nondiagnostic. Research genome sequencing under an institutional review board (IRB)-approved study protocol revealed that both affected children were compound-heterozygous for variants in the SEPSECS gene. One variant was an initiator codon change (c.1A > T) that disrupted protein translation, consistent with the observation that most disease-causing variants are loss-of-function changes. The other variant was a coding change (c.846G > A) that was predicted to be synonymous but had been demonstrated to disrupt mRNA splicing in a minigene assay. The SEPSECS gene encodes O-phosphoseryl-tRNA(Sec) selenium transferase, an enzyme that participates in the biosynthesis and transport of selenoproteins in the body. Variations in SEPSECS cause autosomal recessive pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 2D (PCHT 2D; OMIM #613811), a neurodegenerative condition characterized by progressive cerebrocerebellar atrophy, microcephaly, and epileptic encephalopathy. The identification of biallelic pathogenic variants in this family-one of which was a synonymous change not identified by prior clinical testing-not only ended the diagnostic odyssey for this family but also highlights the contribution of occult pathogenic variants that may not be recognized by standard genetic testing methodologies.